|
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) <snipping> (...) Yes. Point? <snip> (...) Who knows? I know he aided and abetted terrorists. Whether they were the actually ones involved in terrorism against the US is anyone's guess. The point is that he was a friend of terrorism and an (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
| (...) We provide plenty of details. It's just you'd rather believe detainees lying from a playbook rather than your government. Again I give the standard "we aren't perfect", but we do a good job; better than any other. (...) You are changing the (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
| (...) While almost half of the American population agrees with you, a little more than half felt otherwise. And, here soon, someone else will have to handle this mess. And, you are correct, this is a mess. What would really go far in cleaning it up (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
| (...) Actually it is grossly rigged, just not the way most folks think of it. It is rigged in to a brain fried, corporate sponsored 2 party system. If you're part of any other party , you might as well pucker up, because your going to end up kissing (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | Re: Repost, for the benefit of those on newsreaders
|
| (...) What is beyond reason is blindly believing a government that refuses to divulge details of the confinements. (...) Gay Marriage? Go ahead, tell me you support it. If you do, then you've been lying for a long time. (...) Gay Marriage. (...) No (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |