|
|
 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| (...) Oh, gee, yeah, that certainly justifies it. :-/ First, the retailer catalog was never "released" (to consumers). Retailer catalogs are sent to *retailers* for *retailers* to use for their businesses. Second, to the best of my knowledge, this (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| Todd, Let's face it, if TLC were THAT worried about the pics in the retailer catalog getting out there, they wouldn't release it so early. It's not rationalizing, it's flat out common sense. If TLC can't imagine that the pics WILL make it on the Web (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FMEvqu.Kr@lugnet.com... (...) <Snip> (...) have (...) That's the point, that's the POINT!.. Selçuk (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| (...) Bingo. (...) Bzzt. Rationalizing. --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Your point is? --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
