| |
Todd,
Let's face it, if TLC were THAT worried about the pics in the retailer catalog
getting out there, they wouldn't release it so early. It's not rationalizing,
it's flat out common sense. If TLC can't imagine that the pics WILL make it on
the Web in this day and age, they are truly clueless about the net economy and
are doomed.
As others have noted, retailers in many countries have had these catalogs ON THE
SHELVES for customers to view for many years. If TLC were so worried about it,
I'm sure they would have cracked down on this long before.
Again, until I specifically see something from TLC saying NOT to distribute the
pics, I see nothing wrong with it whatsoever.
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher Lannan writes:
> > [...]
> > I guess I just don't know if publishing information that a company doesn't
> > want us to see is "wrong" (don't reporters do this all the time?) though I
> > will agree that it could be considered hostile to that companies interests,
> > and if we as AFOLs are trying to create a better relationship with tLC then
> > maybe not a good idea.
>
> Bingo.
>
> > taking the reporter idea farther- it seems that it is tLC's job to keep
> > their secrets secret and it is the reporter's job not to- both sides have
> > their part to play in this "game."
>
> Bzzt. Rationalizing.
>
> --Todd
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
