 | | Re: They Know Where You Are!
|
|
(...) Reason is one of my fave mags... I cite from it here on a regular basis. So my opinion is of course biased but I find it well worth 15 a year. It's got a viewpoint you're not going to find very many other places, mores the pity. I have a (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in liberated Iraq"
|
|
(...) And yet at the same time, Aljazeera.net (of all places) prints this (URL) upbeat article. Is it really ALL bad news, or is that just the stuff that sells? (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearly those Canadians are concerned about censorship...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote: <snip> (...) Canadians and boring kinda go hand in hand... Waittaminit... Anyway, not so much a protest against nudity, rather a protest against censorship and the furor caused by Janet's boob-- (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | They Know Where You Are!
|
|
This is way cool: (URL) worth the $15 bucks for a subscription. Subscribing by April 9th, 2004 will get you a copy: https://www.kable.co...ewsubs.asp (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) No need to find a marriage licence between Hussein and OBL. The only link neccessary is that they both posed a threat. OBL was able to carry out his evil intentions in 2001, Hussein was stopped before he was able to harm us. (...) If Iraqi's (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) Nor does he mention Washington's “inaction” at the time; did the washington not block a UN motion condemning SH? (...) No, some say it is second only to Scottish Haggis. Scott A (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) lol. By "dealings", I assume you mean give them WMD and help oppress their populations? BTW: Don't forget, SH was the "lesser of two evils" during the 1991 uprising. (...) Are you saying all post 1945 US military actions have been illegal? (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) Well, the point is that to justify his choice to invade Iraq, Dubya condemned Hussein for using chemical and biological weapons against his enemies and his own people. Dubya did not mention that these were the very same weapons and delivery (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From Reason: "It's all bad news - Chaos in occupied Iraq"
|
|
(...) I’ve always thought that this was a silly criticism, true twenty years ago, during the Iran/Iraq war we supported Hussein as the lesser of two evils, you act as if we furnished his palace and rolled out the red carpet. We often have dealings (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Monkey's Uncle
|
|
(URL) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
