 | | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: snip (...) The terribly sad part about this entire thing is the memory (or the lack thereof) of the voting populace. What I'm beginning to see right now is the American economy improving (so the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shopoholic stampede (UPDATE)
|
|
(...) Can you point to an online article to that effect? I've heard of serial victims before, but I'd like to read more info if it's available. Dave! (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Few Liberals identify the stolen election as a major current issue; we grudgingly accept that we are, for now, stuck with the President we have, so let's move on. The lingering issue, however, is that numerous irregularities have come to light (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shopoholic stampede (UPDATE)
|
|
(...) It turns out the poor trampled woman has been "injured" enough in the past that she has a history of 16 lawsuits, 10 of which she recived money for. The pig smell is still there however I don't think it's coming from Wal-Mart!-Ken (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Remember the Axis of Evil?
|
|
Remember the Axis of Evil? Well it appears Bush has been exporting “terrorist suspects” to Syria to take advantage of “more robust interrogation techniques” (ie torture). Read about the case of a Canadian national here: (URL) Maher Arar sues Syria, (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
|
|
(...) In the UK, the Left, Right & Centre enjoy a chortle at Bush's electoral credentials (and his intellectual abilities). From an international PR PoV, Bush has been a disaster for the USA. He has destroyed a great deal of the international (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I think it would be instructive for you and everyone else that is concerned about this matter (all 3 of you :-) ) to review Todd's original (URL) post> especially the last sentence: "However, in the process I expect you in turn to respect the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) I think that was the gist of Scott's repetition of the Left's tired "joke". Har, Har, Bush was selected, not elected. The fact is, however, that Bush's "selection" was a result of Gore contesting the election. Had not he gone to court, Bush's (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Eh... No, "re-elected" means that he has been elected once, and now hes trying to get re-elected. Actually, im not entirly sure if he WAS elected once, but i guess that term will have to suffice.... Alex (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Fraser vs Fraiser! Next on Fox! Was blah blah blah Dubya
|
|
(...) Baby I hear those blues a'callin,... tossed salads and scrambled eggs... Dr. Crane has left the building.... It reminds me of I can't remember which show, but someone said, "Oh, this is that 'Three's Company' episode where there's a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Man, can't you go one thread without referring to Kelsey Grammer? 8^) Dave! (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) *Bam!* And down goes Fraser! Dave K -in the parlance of all the net-philes, "Dubya pwned!" or "Scott A>Dubya" -Take 2--fixing a plethora of problems, least of which is the FTX :) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) And sown goes Fraser! Dave K -in the parlance of all the net-philes, "Dubya pwned!" or "Scott A>Dubya" (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Note: The term "re-elected" implies he has already been elected. ;) Scott A (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Marchetti wrote: (snip) (...) "Letter of the TOS"? Really. Tell me how exactly your post is anywhere near on topic for .admin. Grow up. JOHN (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I completely agree he was rabble rousing and fully aware of it. Also arguably as egregious with its "in your face" attitude was his flaunting the fact that he was posting with a dead email address and not providing a good one. But I saw no (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) I would vigorously dispute that. In fact I already have, and the person I disputed them with was satisfied that what I was getting at was that Richard acknowledge that he erred, acknowledge that he doesn't get a pass because he's an Angry (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
|
|
(...) Hop Frog cannot answer you because he has been banned. BTW, about the ban... what I would have suggested is a blanket ban with a definite time frame. He obviously posted knowing full well he was in violation of the TOS so a ban is in order. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Information War (was Re: Bush is almost as much of an idiot as is John Neal)
|
|
(...) Well, Hop-Frog, we may be enemys on the .Castle front, but-- Wow. Incredible speach. Bravo, thrice over! alex (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bush fires Guantanamo defence team
|
|
(...) Its about getting George W. Bush re-elected. Duh- didnt everybody know that the war was just so that Mr. Bush could get in some good photos of him acting like a little smarty by landing on an aircraft carrier? I mean, if Iraq was of no threat (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
