 | | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
|
(...) I've heard figures like that, and you're absolutely correct that the trend is worrying. Of similar concern is the tendency to group Saddam and al Qaeda together simply because they can be broadly categorized at "Arabs who hate the United (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
|
(...) I read in a newspaper the other day that, according to a poll, 42% of the US population thought that the reason for the plans for war against Iraq, was that Iraq was allegely behind the 911 attacks on WTC and Pentagon. If the result from this (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
|
(...) Distant Early Warning. The network of radar bases in Alaska and Canada's far north intended to give the earliest possible terrestrial warning of incoming transpolar missile attack targeted at either the US or Canada. Not the most critical (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Some amusement, while we're on the brink of a stupid war
|
|
(...) About the "Wag the Dog" issue (one of the movie posters had "Wag the Dog Productions..." When Bubba had his 70 hour war, weren't the Republicans all over that, calling it 'Wag the Dog' (the movie was just released a few months before, iirc), (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
|
|
(...) Thanks Larry--my apologies for being abrupt. (...) DEW? Most times I love acronyms... (...) To this I agree--throwing our hats into the same ring as those who commit atrocities is the wrong thing to do. But here we sit in the 21st centruy, in (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
