To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *16391 (-10)
  Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) Israel tricked the Syrians. Fine. The purpose was to control the Golan Heights so as to provide a safe buffer between her and Syria. It was a completely *defensive* strategy. Has Israel used this strategic advantage against Syria in an (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A bad taste picture (Re: Space Rocks!!!)
 
(...) I never mentioned the chatroom in my original post. You're the one that brought it up. (...) Correction: When I try to discuss castle, you and others felt the need to put it down. Constantly. It wasn't an occasional thing, it was virtually (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) The quote demonstrated: a) Why Israel wanted the war. b) How they provoked it. (...) The battle was "mostly over". Israel was reluctant to advance substantially into Arab territory as they feared a counter attack by external powers (i.e. the (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) (Given that this thread-let was about Ms Charen's integrity, I’m bemused that you are using her to justify your argument(!). Have we went full circle?) Even if true, I don't agree it does answer my argument. My questions to you were: 1. Who (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A bad taste picture (Re: Space Rocks!!!)
 
(...) Again, I'm sorry you felt the need to bring it up in here. I'm sorry that when you mentioned Classic Castle I mentioned Classic Space. It was rather mean of me to attempt a humorous jibe/pun. My bad. (...) I'm sorry that jokingly I've said (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) never (...) true. (...) West (...) years (...) Bank. (...) disagree (...) years, (...) refugees (...) be (...) media (...) Israel. (...) This excerpt from one of Mona Charen's articles conters your argument far better than I can and includes (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Anyone building with LEGO?
 
(...) Roger that-- I misunderstood you. I thought you were referring to hitting on the head in *this* NG:-) -John (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Anyone building with LEGO?
 
(...) Well this is the OFF-TOPIC section. That said I have been sorting and building far more than I post to .debate. I assume at the end of the day that is one thing we can all agree on. (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Anyone building with LEGO?
 
(...) Follow up now that I am awake and have a fresh coffee. Jude: Thanks, good to hear it. Please do ask if you need any backgrounds or pic's for your 2002 presentations/site. DavidK: Turn the hands on your clock back one hour every time you need (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Anyone building with LEGO?
 
(...) Come on, Dave, be fair. This is an "off-topic" NG-- you shouldn't even be bringing up the L-word here;-) If it really bothers you, filter .debate. You'll never know it's there. As far as Brickshelf is concerned, if you search by topic (as I (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR