To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *16201 (-5)
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) I shall let Dan answer that. ;) Scott A (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) I did not expect an answer from you on this. The reality is that anyone who did celebrate the loss of life on September-11 probably would view those killed as being supporters of the “Zionist oppressor/aggressor/whatever”. That is, in the same (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) And is a jest any less legitimate than any other form of art? ROSCO (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
 
(...) Nicely said! The second someone's actions negatively impact on someone else, is where the line is drawn. If a person gets his kicks by reading dirty magazines, he has the freedom to do so. If he leaves the magazine laying around for kids to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
 
(...) Sorry-- couldn't resist:-) (...) It is an interesting scenario. I am not for the government restricting the rights of adults so much as I am concerned about protecting minors from disgusting things adults like to do. Although she *is* free to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR