|
|
 | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) Well, I gotta go with Scott on this one-- I definitely think the Holocaust sets were, and were intended to be, art. Controversial art certainly, but art nonetheless. I get the feeling from Dan that his work was intended to be silly, and not (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | What is Art..(again?) (was:Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?)
|
| (...) Guilt as charged-- I guess that one slipped out:-) (...) A hot button issue for me, as I stated elsewhere, and no time to delve into it now, but here is the short of it. I realize that a definition of art is elusive at best, but I am more (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) Oh what was that quote from West Wing--Republicans being 'small-minded, xenophobic, anti-choice, gun worshipping...' oh I can't remember--going to have to watch a tape tonite! :) Yes, in *your* opinion, the holocaust set were not art. In *my* (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) I disagree only because I don't see these as competing views! In my view, the artist is no more or less an observer than anyone else, when it comes to viewing/judging/interpreting the work. To that end, "art is what the artist says is art," (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) This is a hot button issue for me, because I really dislike a definition of art to be "anything"-- it's useless IMO. (...) An artist can call the sky pink, but that doesn't make it so. More hot buttons:-) (...) I'd bet BPS wouldn't agree with (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
