To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *15655 (-5)
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) Why would it be preferable, in this hypothetical example, to be ruled by machines than governed by humans? Dave! (Only half kidding... After all, we cannot allow a mine shaft gap.) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) If you mean no "bombs" were dropped, I agree. On every other level is was a disaster. Its legacy lives on throughout the developing world today. Calling it a "cold" war is a complete misnomer. Perhaps of OBL had a few nukes, 911 would never (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) I guess I was being too simplistic. How about when everyone carried onboard defense-ware that would automagically compute threats and attacks and either alert you to them or respond with massive lethal destructive force? And what if that were (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) Those who think they can draw faster? ROSCO (24 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: An armed society...
 
(...) This was fine. Don't profane and don't attack people and I think everything else just falls into place. (...) I hold various opinions that I "know" are right and they are in opposition to my society (or at least the vast majority of it). (...) (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR