|
|
 | | Just when I thought Pennsylvania couldn't get weirder...
|
| (URL) Dave! (24 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | ??? (was Re: An armed society...(what if?))
|
| (...) LFB, Kirby is a little too conspiracy prone for my taste also (really, it's his one obvious debate flaw), but that doesn't mean that he is wrong -- the fact is, Kirby is right in most of the broader strokes of his statements, even if he screws (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) I meant to comment on this yesterday but didn't get around to it. You appear to be very fond of this quote; in looking for your post I searched for "+Brady +socialist" and found that you've previously cited the quote another two times. Three (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) No. In the British context, the Government is the Prime Minister and the Secretaries he or she assembles. The Monarch is, well, the Monarch. And it's not an armed rebellion, it was a Civil War. ;) (...) No. "United Kingdom" refers only to (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) So let's see, people who don't come to the same conclusion as you do, given the same evidence, are ignorant? No--rather, I'd argue that you've determined the "truth"--or the end conclusion--before you went out looking for evidence. I'm still (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
