|
|
 | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Yes, there is a benefit. One leadership at that scale cannot see the trees for the forest -- only the big problems could be dealt with, and not the smaller local ones. It is my assertion that I have no idea from here in CA what would suit the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Scott's too lazy to unsubscribe
|
| (...) Interestingly, my subs has just been cancelled: ==+== You have been unsubscribed from the mailing list lp-announce by WWW form: (URL) shall miss the paranoia, I'm almost tempted to take the time to subscribe myself. Scott A (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Right. And I take my read on what's constitutional from what the founding fathers *intended*, not from what the current supreme court says about the matter. As I've said before, many times, effectively answering the question posed. As an (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) They're true assertions about how things operate. Further, they're extremely valid reasons for the powers that be to want drugs illegal although I deny that they've organised into an overarching conspiracy that has thought things through. But (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) There is a FLEXIBILITY built into the system. Sometimes it's a good thing in my view, sometimes it's a bad thing. My argument is less with the govt. system than the people of this country -- they often seem not to care about politics, and when (...) (24 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
