|
|
 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) Why? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
|
| (...) Larry, What you do is cut-and-paste LP dogma repeatedly in an effort to incite a noisy debate. When you do it, you are unwilling to justify what you post. My most recent action aside, if people are unhappy with me justifying any point I make (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: The position of authority (was: Handgun Death Rate)
|
| (...) What is you proposed solution on this? Smaller parties in the UK back PR as they hope it will benefit them? Is that on the agenda in the USA? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) I assume the resultant gun is then illegal? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate
|
| (...) This is an interesting point, but I think it can be avoided if it is a Federal test, not a state or other local test. Since the test should be done in conjunction with the training course, there shouldn't be a problem: if it ain't in the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
