 | | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Pornography is just a graphical depiction of sex. Sex happens in real life. Violence happens in real life to varying degrees. Get threatened with a crow-bar, or get maced sometime. I feel that both are pretty violent and they have both (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Let me back-track for a minute. I think I started down a different path than we were originally on. I think the government should reduce it's size period. It doesn't need to be as large as it is. Too much red tape already. That said, let's (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
|
|
(...) That is *exactly* what we are doing when we say the lion is amoral. We are saying that our morals do not apply to it. That's where the breakdown in communication is happening. You appear to be operating with a different definition of "amoral" (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
|
|
(...) I think he was referring to your efforts to veer the debate in an attempt to make First Amendment = Child Pornography. Granted, there's room for a .debate there, but that's not the crux of the matter (nor, technically, is it a problem with the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Why? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Irony (...) So the money should be spent regulating itself getting smaller? (...) We do not live there. How would you solve the problems in this world? (...) Is this the best you can do? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Dave spotted it too: (URL) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
|
(...) Very interesting. I will have to read more about it and see how the story developes. I hadn't heard of the technique before, so I can't argue any points about it yet :-) -Duane (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Alarm as Bush plans health cover for unborn
|
|
(...) This, for some reason reminded me of this: (URL) para: "In a country where 40m people have no health insurance, the Bush administration is planning to offer publicly funded medical coverage to foetuses, in a move which pro-choice activists (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Couldn't resist
|
|
(...) Talk about up-to-the-minute. See these topics: (URL) I didn't want to weigh down this basically light-hearted discussion, but you (...) I agree (about being a drag etc). Still, I thought .debate was a good place for discussion of Adam's rib (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
