Subject:
|
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:29:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
907 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> > > >
> > > > What is you could not afford it?
> > >
> > > Ask for assistance from a charity. There are plenty of grants and
> > > scholarships available for primary & secondary education. Just like
> > > post-secondary. You just need to look for it.
> >
> > So you think there is enough charity money out there for everyone to go
> > cap-in-hand for a hand out?
>
>
> Yes. Although not everyone has to.
>
> > > I'm all for educating
> > > children,
> >
> > Controversial
>
> How so?
Irony
>
> >
> > > but I don't agree with the way the government is spending MY money
> > > on education. That's why I would rather take MY money and go elsewhere.
> >
> > You said this before. I asked you where the money should be spent - I think
> > you replied saying the government should regulate itself more (ie more
> > bureaucracy). But the question is - regulate itself more doing what exactly?
>
> By reducing itself (fat chance).
So the money should be spent regulating itself getting smaller?
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > If a parent
> > > > > > > can't keep track of what their children are doing on a regular basis then
> > > > > > > they shouldn't have been a parent in the first place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How do you propose they should be stopped? Who should stop them? Who should
> > > > > > pay for it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Themselves. My opinion is that they shouldn't have been a parent if they
> > > > > weren't ready. It's their decision though. If they were going to do the
> > > > > deed, they should be willing to pay the price.
> > > >
> > > > We are back to where we started - you still have not answered my point.
> > >
> > > How should they be stopped? Abstinence - it's the only true way to prevent
> > > pregnancy. Yes contraceptives are effective, just not 100% effective. If you
> > > use contraceptives you still need to be willing to live with the failure of
> > > the device and possible resulting pregnancy.
> > >
> > > Who should stop them? Themselves hopefully. I know that's too much to ask,
> > > but it would be nice in an idealistic world. I'm not going to step in and I
> > > don't want the government to either.
> >
> > If they are negligent enough to be a bad parent, what makes you think they
> > will care enough to abstain?
>
> I said "idealistic world".
We do not live there. How would you solve the problems in this world?
>
> > How do they know they will be a bad parent?
>
> That's what education is for.
Is this the best you can do?
Scott A
>
> >
> > >
> > > Who should pay for it? They should pay for their own prevention.
> > >
> > > Are those answers enough?
> >
> > I shall let you be the judge of that.
> >
> > Scott A
>
>
> -Duane
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
