To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11565
11564  |  11566
Subject: 
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:05:27 GMT
Viewed: 
858 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:

What is you could not afford it?

Ask for assistance from a charity. There are plenty of grants and
scholarships available for primary & secondary education. Just like
post-secondary. You just need to look for it.

So you think there is enough charity money out there for everyone to go
cap-in-hand for a hand out?


Yes. Although not everyone has to.

I'm all for educating
children,

Controversial

How so?


but I don't agree with the way the government is spending MY money
on education. That's why I would rather take MY money and go elsewhere.

You said this before. I asked you where the money should be spent - I think
you replied saying the government should regulate itself more (ie more
bureaucracy). But the question is - regulate itself more doing what exactly?

By reducing itself (fat chance).




If a parent
can't keep track of what their children are doing on a regular basis then
they shouldn't have been a parent in the first place.

How do you propose they should be stopped? Who should stop them? Who should
pay for it?

Themselves. My opinion is that they shouldn't have been a parent if they
weren't ready. It's their decision though. If they were going to do the
deed, they should be willing to pay the price.

We are back to where we started - you still have not answered my point.

How should they be stopped? Abstinence - it's the only true way to prevent
pregnancy. Yes contraceptives are effective, just not 100% effective. If you
use contraceptives you still need to be willing to live with the failure of
the device and possible resulting pregnancy.

Who should stop them? Themselves hopefully. I know that's too much to ask,
but it would be nice in an idealistic world. I'm not going to step in and I
don't want the government to either.

If they are negligent enough to be a bad parent, what makes you think they
will care enough to abstain?

I said "idealistic world".

How do they know they will be a bad parent?

That's what education is for.



Who should pay for it? They should pay for their own prevention.

Are those answers enough?

I shall let you be the judge of that.

Scott A


-Duane



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
(...) Irony (...) So the money should be spent regulating itself getting smaller? (...) We do not live there. How would you solve the problems in this world? (...) Is this the best you can do? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
(...) So you think there is enough charity money out there for everyone to go cap-in-hand for a hand out? (...) Controversial (...) You said this before. I asked you where the money should be spent - I think you replied saying the government should (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR