To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *11052 (-5)
  Now: Women Was: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Us "women" do understand the message. You think I have time to be active in the Libertarian party? I'm too danged busy fighting all the other stereotypes out there, such as, I'm supposed to be the size of Kate Moss and all the other starving (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: McViegh is no Libertarian
 
(...) You assume I am not one? :-) (...) Do not have to sign a pledge to be a libertarian? (...) Can you be sure of that? How so? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) So where would that outlook stand on this story: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) So where do Dave and I differ on this? How is there a class is difference between our views? (...) Where did I say that? Where? I think they are less likely too. I think any ideas they would have would be treated very sceptically. But I do not (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) You are wrong. Youch, an insult! (...) Youch, an insult! Go back and read the 1st message in this thread, you will see this whole "debate" is a troll. BTW - I have no middle name. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR