|
|
 | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes: <snip> I assume (...) No you're not! ;-) And Tammy, by the looks of it, you didn't kill this thread either. Now it's my turn. /\/\ark - watching the 3724 watching him - de Kock (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Absolutely correct. As you're fond of saying, this is a big tent, with room for all. However, and I think this is Dan's point, between hard-core builders and hard-core collectors, there is a significant paradigm shift. To me (and I suspect Dan (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Alright, a little overzealous, but I can live with that. We be cool then. Bruce (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| That's good, I can go with that... Eric (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
|
| (...) Why *side* with either? Why are there sides *at all* for that matter? That is what is baffling me. This isn't a territorial war, is it? Both "sides" can "win", can't they? I'm a builder AND a collector and there is nothing wrong with being (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
