|
|
 | | Re: Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
| (...) I must also offer my own apologies to everyone at Lugnet. Though I do not plan to continue to post regularly, it was wrong of me to say that everyone here attributes to Lugnet's problem. However, that does not remove the fact that Lugnet still (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| I'm sorry you feel this way, Anthony. I read through the posts and I think, by and large, that most of the replies were pretty cordial, but there were a couple that went a bit overboard on attacking you personally instead of debating your point. I (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| (...) Anthony Please Don't leave Lugnet or stop posting. I have been in your shoes before. When I suggested that some people would not be especially happy if the July surprise was the reissue of the early 80's sets. (specifically the guarded Inn but (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Lugnet has a problem
|
| (...) I'm not certain why you set the FUT to .off-topic.debate, because it is certainly on-topic for LUGNET. Anyhow, in keeping with my vow to stay out of this group, this is going to be a fire-and-forget message :] My advice is to just not worry (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Sorry Anthony (was Re: Lugnet has a problem) plz read
|
| Anthony, I 'm posting because I was the person that possibly branded you a complainer. I'd like you to read this whole post objectively, so I'd like to offer my apology in advance, hoping that you'll see a few things differently, and continue to be (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.castle)
|
|
