|
|
 | | Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
|
| Whoops, don't normally reply to myself but: (...) And while he may have had valid points, it IS Todd's server, he's paying for it, and so I think you should have to abide by his rules. (C'mon, there must be a way to get what you both want in an (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) This is one reason I really like the Nature Conservancy. The bulk of their effort goes to acquiring property, either through outright purchase, or by attaining conservation easements. Once they have acquired property rights by (mostly) free (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
|
| (...) No, the impression I got was that the author preferred the Demopublican Party. Frank (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| Although I have not read all of this I find this very unproductive. I am happy to be called "disruptive" if it means questioning those who make unsubstantiated remarks. I am sure those who make unsubstantiated remarks are happy that you are creating (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) Me too, actually. It seems to me like the only fair thing to do, and as long as it's a user fee that is pretty fairly apportioned, then I'd have no complaints. I'd actually like to see some reasonable attempt to remediate environmental damages (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
