To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brandsOpen lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Clone Brands / 840
839  |  841
Subject: 
Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.tx, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
Date: 
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 03:12:45 GMT
Viewed: 
213 times
  
In lugnet.general, Dave Low writes:
> In lugnet.general, Kyle D. Jackson writes:
> > It's the same story in much of Canada.  I suppose it could be called
> > "brand dilution" but it's somewhat inevitable if you're the most
> > recognized brand.  And it could be a good thing, I think.  LEGO claims
> > to be gunning for that title now...
> > 
> > People call almost all building bricks "LEGO" because that's most
> > famous one that everyone identifies with.
> > 
> > But back to the note I found from LEGO, it wasn't that they were
> > saying that people shouldn't call other brands "LEGO", that goes
> > without saying.  It was that people shouldn't call actual LEGO
> > by "LEGOS".  That's what I found was funny.  Actually, I took it
> > from two points of view:
> > 1) I found it almost pathetic:  "Please don't call us that it's
> > not really our name and we don't like it"  :]
> > 2) It could even be a little "snooty":  "You're not saying it
> > right!  It's 'LEGO'!!  Sheesh get it right..., you can't buy our
> > product anymore until you say it right"  :]
> 
> Lego/Legos creates brand dilution too, particularly in the usage "I bought these
> MegaBlok legos because they were cheaper, and fit with other legos."
> 
> Think about God/gods. You talk about God, you're talking about the One Almighty.
> You talk about gods, you're contemplating various beings that share the
> attribute of divinity, with none of them "owning" the term "god".
> 
> --DaveL

Actually, gods exsisted long before your "God" who, when you think about it,
stole the term. I personally don't think lego has anything to worry about. I
mean, Megabloks? I wouldn't be all that scared if was them.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
(...) Does God have a name for God? follow up in off-topic.debate if you dare... My example (perhaps a bad one) aimed to show how a proper noun in the singular describes something quite differently from a common noun in the plural, or used (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.tx, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
(...) Lego/Legos creates brand dilution too, particularly in the usage "I bought these MegaBlok legos because they were cheaper, and fit with other legos." Think about God/gods. You talk about God, you're talking about the One Almighty. You talk (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.tx, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR