|
In lugnet.general, Paul Gardosik writes:
> > Lego/Legos creates brand dilution too, particularly in the usage "I bought
> > these MegaBlok legos because they were cheaper, and fit with other legos."
> >
> > Think about God/gods. You talk about God, you're talking about the One
> > Almighty. You talk about gods, you're contemplating various beings that share
> > the attribute of divinity, with none of them "owning" the term "god".
>
> Actually, gods exsisted long before your "God" who, when you think about it,
> stole the term.
Does God have a name for God? follow up in off-topic.debate if you dare...
My example (perhaps a bad one) aimed to show how a proper noun in the singular
describes something quite differently from a common noun in the plural, or used
generically. See David Zorn's ealier note on "Coke"="cola drink":
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=29057
> I personally don't think lego has anything to worry about. I mean, Megabloks? I
> wouldn't be all that scared if was them.
I don't think they're too worried about market-share yet. I think they've been
very concerned for a long time about Megabloks (or whoever) being able to label
their competing product as "legos".
--DaveL
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Does God have a name for God?
|
| (...) First of all, I don't know if I am supposed to take this discussion only to off-topic.debate or also have it cross-posted to general. If someone knows better, let me know. God existed first, before anything else. He created all things, (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
137 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|