|
|
 | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Exactly what are the "LEGO ideals" that you feel they've diverged from? (21 years ago, 22-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) This is the group designated for clone discussion, pro or con. It should stay polite, just as with any group, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't have the right to make negative statements about clones here. They should, however, be aware (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) A certain group of non-clone users may fall into that group, but I suspect it's less an issue than you seem to suspect. Some people avoid clones because they feel that they're violating TLC's patent rights, others avoid them because they (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) Dave!! Nicely said! Dave K (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Richard isn't claiming that you have no right to opinion. He is instead pointing out that, without evidence to the contrary, your view cannot be a considered opinion except on pure faith. Until you demonstrate some knowledge of the brand that (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
|
