 | | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) A little late on the reply here (missed this post), but here goes anyway: I don't see them as bad per se, it's just that they seem to be replacing LUGNET, because people only have so much time to devote to LEGO (what is wrong with these (...) (14 years ago, 28-Aug-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) Editing goes against "the newsgroup spirit", which was a big deal to Todd... (and maybe that means the implementation of editing would be hard, I have no idea) But cancellation, if by the author, does not go against that spirit, in my view. (...) (14 years ago, 31-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) I also agree that Lugnet was THE place to go back in the day and I also wouldn't mind seeing it rise again. But I am just thinking that Lugnet's inability to edit and cancel posts will be a huge factor preventing it from being the proverbial (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) While I am also disappointed with the reduced interraction on LUGNET, I don't see other boards as bad, even if they aren't superior in features. And I totally disagree about flickr - it allows conversations to go every which way no matter (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Universe Tradition Card Game coming
|
|
(...) Yeah, but I think that the analogy is flawed. The horseless carriage is FAR superior to what it replaced; other boards may have a nice feature here and there, but they are not VASTLY superior to LUGNET. I think that there is great value in (...) (14 years ago, 30-Jul-10, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
