 | | Re: Train Spotters
|
| (...) Sorry. It is a reference to a scene in the cult classic film, (URL) Fletch> (...) Well, you did use the term "powerdrill enima" (sic). That unique ref couldn't be left alone:-) At least the FU is here in the appropriate place. BTW, discussions (...) (19 years ago, 27-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) This reminds me of a debate loooong ago on RTL (search LEGOdeath, IIRC) about art. The rub is in the defining of "art". What is art? Because if art is anything, then art is everything, and therefore nothing-- that is, the term is meaningless. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) Exactly? I feel, that art should be something that is admired by "the common" man; and not be reproducible by the commoner. To me, art is something I would not be able to do. I can not paint a Mona Lisa, or carve "The Thinker." That is art. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) Why, exactly, must art represent anything? Dave! (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: To No One's Big Surprise...
|
| (...) NO dave, Everyone knows with an infinite number of monkeys you get the works of Shakespear. NOT Picasso. Once again, proving that Janey, and her monkey abstract art is NOT art. but really, just a pile of monkey SH-- (1) Chris 1. not at all (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
