|
|
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that's not entirely surprising. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Reply to my own post so I can insert my sig (that I keep forgetting about!) and to see how replying to one's self looks on legnet. Man do I wish that this interface had editing capability. But I am happy that Firefox 2.0.0.3 has built-in (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) I was saying that I was sorry for stealing almost all of Tim's words from his post seen here (and the joke being fairly lame now that I think of it - lol): (URL) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| --snip-- (...) He didn't apologise... he appologised. There was a reason I snipped ;) Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) The funny thing is, as far as I can tell, and fwiw, Word Spellcheck agrees, Bob didn't make any spelling errors in that post. And so the mystery remains as to what exactly Bob was apologising for... Allister - spring loaded to the baffled (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
