To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / *54021 (-10)
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that's not entirely surprising. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) Reply to my own post so I can insert my sig (that I keep forgetting about!) and to see how replying to one's self looks on legnet. Man do I wish that this interface had editing capability. But I am happy that Firefox 2.0.0.3 has built-in (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) I was saying that I was sorry for stealing almost all of Tim's words from his post seen here (and the joke being fairly lame now that I think of it - lol): (URL) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
--snip-- (...) He didn't apologise... he appologised. There was a reason I snipped ;) Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) The funny thing is, as far as I can tell, and fwiw, Word Spellcheck agrees, Bob didn't make any spelling errors in that post. And so the mystery remains as to what exactly Bob was apologising for... Allister - spring loaded to the baffled (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) Geeze Tim, you too can post "not nice " messages. Each forum has its "Forum Nazi's." While I am off inventoring, why don't you go and stick some bricks together. John P (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) I think I do get it. (...) I appreciate Tim's contribution to the community here, few come close to his involvement and knowledge. His MOC production is, I think, unequalled in recent times. I do not think LUGNET is 'his forum', but I (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) Thanks sergeant. Now be a good boy and do some more inventories. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: siggy testaroo
 
(...) Richie: Don't you get it? Tim G has something to say about everything. I am surprised he doesn't respond to his own postings. You know Lugnet is his forum, don't you? John P (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
 
  Re: New style brick separators free from Knex
 
(...) They are no longer free, but they do work well. Knex bricks and plates are all slightly rounded at the top (child safety) and the new seperator acts like a tweezers, easily fitting into the connection between elements and separating. (19 years ago, 30-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR