 | | just testing...
|
|
Img: (URL) Link: (URL) Img Link: (URL) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
| | Testing spaces
|
|
Tore's LDraw Color Chart LDR = ldconfig.ldr LUG = guide.lugnet.com/par...ef/colors/ Trp = Transparent Lt = Light Dk = Dark LDR LUG LUG Name L3Lab / L3P 0 0 Black yes 1 1 Blue yes 2 2 Green yes 3 3 Teal yes 4 4 Red yes 5 5 Dark Pink yes (L3: Purple) (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | New style brick separators free from Knex
|
|
K'nex is now releasing their new version of the brick seperator. As part of their all out effort to optain market share in the brick construction hobby, they are offering 5 packs of their separators FREE for the cost of shipping. The new separators (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) Hey, we don't want any mention of THAT place here! ;-) Tim (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) What's the standard, then? Does censorship cover anything that doesn't include everything? That would define "censorship" so thinly that it would have no meaning at all. But if we insetad define "censorship" to be an action of government, then (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) So, you're arguing that censorship can only be effected by a government, or illegally? By illegally, I'm suggesting that a private citizen/organization violates an agreement such as public free speech or their own TOS. Essentially, I think (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) Just because something is a legal restriction of free speech doesn't make it not censorship. Free speech is not a complimentary set of censorship and the two can in fact overlap, likewise the absence of one does not guarantee the presence of (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bible as a literal source?
|
|
(...) Then perhaps we are more closely in agreement than I had realized. (...) Well now you are assuming that I literally believe the Genesis account of creation, which would be a stretch. Given that Western cultures still believed that the Earth (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) Nope. The child and parents can still read the book at the local library or at the bookstore or even online. The private school is choosing not to carry a particular book on private property, which isn't censorship. Suppose I write a book that (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
|
(...) I definitely disagree. If a private school wants to exclude any and all books from its premisis talking about Darwin's evolutionary theory, that's censorship! Everyone involved might be totally fine with it, and they might have made you aware (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
