 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) extremes start when limits are reached. but where (what) are the limits? Some limits are quite clear and well determined : - topic (that's why this thread on lugnet.off-topic part of the site), - TOS,TOU, - federal, national, international (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Ah, but where do extremes start? Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) **sighs** I guess when one's hobby is a toy, there will be children involved! :) Personally, I think it's bad for the overall AFOL community. I'll grant you, (A) I'm still sort of new to the community (even with 37 years of LEGO under my (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I was recently involved in something similar, when I took exception to the characterization of one site (Site A) by members of another, much larger site (Site B). Frankly, the postings struck me as petty and really kind of snide, and I posted (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Well, here's an important distinction: who's doing the saying? And in what capacity? Let's say AFOLS.com is run by Mortimer. And a frequent visitor to the AFOLS.com is Jezebelle. And there's another site called LEGOGEEKS.com, which they hate. (...) (20 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
