 | | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) --snip-- (...) John, It was not polite to make the comment "Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit since they did a few.". The reason it isn't polite is because it is a) unneccesary and b) expectant as (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Tim: I was not rude to volunteers, I even offered to volunteer to get thing done. I want to help and have only come here when Dan ignored my requests as to what was happening to the corrections sent into Peeron.com. I am still not sure what (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: --snip-- (...) John, You're really beginning to make me very irritated. You seem unable to accept responsibility for the way you put things and seem to justify this in a variety of ways including (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) For a guy who's thick-skinned, you sure when to a lot of trouble to prove it. (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Thanks Dave: Thanks Dave: I treat others well. If anything is rude it is the people that take apart every comment I make, which I really do not give a hoot about. The inventories are messed up; I am trying to fix that. Almost every one I look (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Then please, leave out the commentary. You come across as being condescending, insulting, and rude. If you have corrections that you want to post to Lugnet, well, fine I guess. But if your intent is to start a flame war so that it draws (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Oh no, not that old Mac vs PC again!
|
|
(...) I have never said or even thought of Apple appearing to be dead. But my experience of Mac users is that they have had a very condescending attitude towards us Windows losers... I mean users. As you and I haven't discused this utterly boring (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Notetab
|
|
(...) LOL Notepad creates at least one registry entry too (and I don't want to know how many more!) ROSCO (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Thanks. I've already done that now. /Tore (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Apple *no longer appears to be a dead company* and now we are the snobs? (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Notetab
|
|
(...) Ok, I replaced Notepad with Notetab, and it is surprisingly fast and in all ways better than MS Notepad. All ways - except one: I also replaced one single .exe file with 129 files in 7 new folders, 3.37 Mb using 5,4 million bytes of disk (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) I've been dealing with this issue my whole Mac using life. I can understand your frustration but not your insistence that everyone comply with your OS. When I've done that in the past I get laughed at. The very existence of the LDraw for Mac (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) And Notepad.exe is 56 kb. Yes, I know I exaggerated. I think I had NoteTab or something very similar in my previous Windows installation due to the 64k limitation in Notepad. And before that, I hacked Notepad to suggest the .dat extension in (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) And, of cousre, the long filenames. :) I rushed together a DOS program called linefix.exe that takes care of the linefeeds while you uploaded the new version of the MPD. I never use MLCad even though it is installed. Browsing parts or models (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Last I checked, the Notetab light installation was 1.4M (yes it still fits on a floppy), and it loads in less than a second on my XP machine. I have been using it for at least 3 years, and I would also highly recommend it for Windows users. (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) Then I misinterpreted the talk of Mac and Linux earlier in this thread. (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
--snip-- (...) I realised I may have been barking at a joke for which I would and should apologise. It would seem I'm not so I make no apologies. (...) I use a Windows XP machine. Tim (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) They still can last I noticed. The earlier version of the file will and does work perfectly well in MLCad (I know this because I opened it in MLCad to make sure before submitting it to ldraw.org for the challenge). It would probably work in (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) You apologize or... you don't? You keep bantering on the far most popular system in the world. Not because it is the best, I am very well aware of that, but because the vast majority of computer users around the globe don't find the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
|
(...) I expected that reply too from you. I once liked LDraw because anyone with almost any computer could use it. (19 years ago, 1-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
