 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Yes, Ross, you made that perfectly clear. What you haven't made so clear is WHY you think that for no apparent reason. (...) Because I have no evidence to the contrary. You are obtuse. (...) Is that why you know so much about him-- because you (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Now that made me smile! :) And if I may be so bold--we do have a forum here for all things JLuggy, and it has the added benefit of contributing to high mirth for *most* members in this group-- (URL) (1) Dave K 1- well, not affiliated with JLug (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) He could also be still reading. (...) Why do you suspect that? (...) (URL) Oh I doubt it>. Of course that could just be someone impersonating him. (...) I never claimed to know about his Lugnet reading habits. (...) Or even moot. Yes, I do (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) (URL) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - Do we need a newsgroup on LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Heh... when we can get that site back online, that is. And since LF will probably no longer have substantial forums... that's actually a possibility. ;) But I was REALLY thinking we need more discussion here about BZPower and all things (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) Only because it is the only other forum which I know you use, that's all. Really. (...) It wasn't my intention to insinuate that. I was making a comparison based on tone. Style. Manner. That sort of thing. (...) My only point is that a JLUG (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) He's not necessarily in the "still reading" subgroup category. He could've been just popping over to LUGNET when he got "pinged" by a regular reader, or after a major event like an ILTCO convention. Which is exactly what I suspect is the case. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I'm not sure why you're bringing Jlug into the discussion here. If I could set the fut to lugnet.org.jlug right now, I would. But now that you have, I say you're arguing from ignorance. There's a far greater sense of camraderie there than I've (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) I think what Dave is driving at is that even though your actions may technically be with the TOS, it is a question of civility. Pushing people's hot buttons and watching the fireworks isn't what LUGNET is about. Lugnet is about laughing with (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
|
(...) OK. Let's try this from the other direction, kiddies. The populace that still reads Lugnet is a group of people. It contains many subgroups, for example: The people that still read lugnet.org.scibrick The people that still read a few groups (...) (20 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
