 | | Re: Looks LIke Snow in Late April....
|
|
(...) Besides, we all know that Rupert Murdoch is the one in charge anyway. He obviously wanted someone more directly involved in his running of the country. ;) Tim (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks LIke Snow in Late April....
|
|
(...) Are you really that cynical, or have you merely been dazed by hanging out in the Dunderground too long? You disappoint me, Dave! I like to think of you as being above all of the partisan blather... JOHN (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Looks LIke Snow in Late April....
|
|
(...) It will be especially interesting to learn if he still thinks that Bush is an "impotent" "embarrassment," as documented (URL) here>. There's also (URL) this> to consider. On the other hand, it's nice that a member of Fox's Ministry of (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Looks LIke Snow in Late April....
|
|
(URL) I happen to like Tony Snow and have heard him a few times filling in on radio talk shows (for Rush maybe?); it will be interesting to see how/if he changes his public persona for his new job. I hope not. JOHN (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
(...) LOL. Thanks. I was testing because I noticed my little LUGNET logo icon isn't showing up next to my name anymore. I think it's because I asked Todd to change my name back to its maiden form and thus something broke. I asked him to look into it (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: testing
|
|
(...) This is your grade A. Of course, you would have got an A+ if you would have used a capital and a period. Wink. Janey "Goofing around Red Brick" (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | testing
|
|
this is a test (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: New Cobi/Best-Lock
|
|
(...) Cool Thanks. I guess the Narnia sets can wait :-) (...) Very nice. If they are going to use stickers, at least they include extras. (...) Looks it I can't wait to get one myself. I stopped by my local TRU today and they had none of the new (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) No, that sounds right on the money to me. Here are the statements that we need to consider: A. I believe that God exists. B. I do not believe that God does not exist. C. I believe that God does not exist D. I do not believe that God exists. A (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Trickily worded! I have a lack of belief in Hoojidangs. I bet you do too, because you don't even know what they are. Neither do I. It's some unknown. Hence, I have a lack of belief in them which requires no faith. I'm not sure I'd even call (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Depending on how you define your operators they may not be. If I define the operator +(a,b) to be what we would conventionally term +(a,2b) and define (-1) as that number which ensures that +(1,(-1))=0 (ie (-1)=-1/2) then the two equations are (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: New Cobi/Best-Lock
|
|
(...) (URL) Here you go>, Mr. Smartypants! The sixth scan is the decal sheet, of which four identical copies came in the set I bought. That canopy element is fantastic! Dave! (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) To sum earlier discussion-- Dave! does not believe that the following equations are equal-- 1 + (-1) = 0 (-1) + 1 = 0 ;) Dave K (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> Their is one notable flaws of logic in this test. They compare the burden (...) That's the question that hung me up. Dave K (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) I got struck with a hit on that one as well: "As long as there are no compelling arguments or evidence that show that God does not exist, atheism is a matter of faith, not rationality." "If, despite years of trying, no strong evidence or (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Would you also argue that the statement "people who believe in God must make a leap of faith" is too broad and non-specific? (...) I would have to say that you are either an agnostic or you have made a leap of faith. It is my opinion that an (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) I don't want to start a whole big thing here, but I'd take issue with that statement as being too broad and non-specific. One form of atheism--the belief that God does not exist--may require a leap of faith, but that's not the only form. I, (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Tricky. I had to go back to that class I took back in my Catholic HS days to think through those questions. In the end I scored zero hits and bit twice. Adr. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Yeah. It's a massively flawed argument IMO. (...) I'm making the point that atheism is as much of a leap of (not)faith as religion is a leap of faith. Thus although I know that agnosticism is logical (as there is nor proof for or against) I (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The God Game!
|
|
(...) Thanks for the parenthetical presumably, Dave! ;-) Fellow 1 bullet biter, JOHN (21 years ago, 25-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
