 | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
| (...) But if you go there, don't tell them that you know John, or you'll be summarily booted. Dave! (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
| (...) See Sore Thumbs (the webcomic) lately. I'd give you a link but not from behind this firewall... (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
| (...) Sorry. That was an inside reference to Dave! I was referring to the (URL) Democratic Underground>. (...) You could have a sample size of 1,000,000, but if it isn't random, then it is worthless. Berkeley is arguabley the most liberal place in (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
| (...) That's an inside joke between Mr. Neal and me. Nothing to do, incidentally, with discussions of the UN Embassy in Denmark, which we have all "let go." (...) I don't know about that last part, but a sample of 2,000 kids growing up in a famously (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
|
| --SNIP-- (...) ???? (...) Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper (...) (21 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
