 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) John, I had no idea that you've finally been touched by (URL) His Noodly Appendage> and seen the light! This is good news indeed. (Larritarianism is so last century, I've switched to Pastafarianism...) (21 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Baaa! Good one. Thank FSM that it was restored in time so that no permanent damage occured! JOHN (21 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) I've been muddling through ok so far... (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Sounds to me like you're totally batsh-- I mean, totally crazy. Dave! FUT: lugnet.off-topic.pus...ng-the-TOS (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Book'em, Guano! Actually, I'm in the dark on that topic. JOHN (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> No TV and no beer make Homer something, something... Most scared I've been during a Simpsons Episode... :) Dave K (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Honesty compels me to admit that I misread that, so that it looked as if you were questioning my underappreciated spelunking. Dave! (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Hmmm, I'm of 2 minds regarding the depiction of your undeprecated debunking. JOHN (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Hey, you sounded pretty good delivering that line, Dave! (not that I'm confusing you with Dave!) Let's hear you say, (URL) Johnny!"> :-D JOHN (most scared I've ever been at a movie) All work and no play makes John a dull boy. All work and no (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) It's true--I only deprecate my pseudo-self. My real self remains totally undeprecated. Dave! (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Oh, your pseudo-self deprecation is soooo transparent, Dave! JOHN (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Of course not--you can't make something from nothing. Dave! (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Ba-dum Dum!! Thank you folks!! John'll be playing here all week! Dave K (21 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Best-Lock
|
|
(...) Hi there! Thanks for checking in and for the info. I actually do own probably around 3000 Best-Lock elements, and maybe two dozen of their minifigs. I am in general agreement with your assessment of compatibility, but I thought that the (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Best-Lock
|
|
Mark W (...) I don't know if either of you have actually tried a BestLock set... yes, they look pretty cool and you get a LOT of pieces for the price. And the fact that they use the stud width = brick height (so a plate is 1/2 a stud thickness, and (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Testing
|
|
Now Testing 1 2 3 Test complete (21 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | testtesttest
|
|
TEST (21 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: VF=139
|
|
(...) If VF>150, someone's gonna get hurt. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | VF=139
|
|
VF=139 (21 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God Have A Name For God?
|
|
(...) The idea of other flocks is a major component of Mormonism. The Mormons hold that the Book of Mormon describes events surrounding another flock before and after a visit from Jesus (after he was crusified). I am not completely certain but I (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
