 | | Re: The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (...) Well, let's be fair. Bennett's comments were so hideously ill-considered that only the most far-right of media outlets have come out in support of him. There's a lot of "what he really meant was" going on post hoc, but the bottom line is what (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | The Guardian unworthy of toilet paper?
|
| (URL) Case closed> Nevermind that Bennett is pro-life. What a smear. And even the Bush administration runs for cover from political hack fallout. Brutal. JOHN (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Two New MOCs
|
| (...) You are becoming an artiste, Dave! (...) I don't know anything about the whole rendering thing, but I'm wondering if (URL) this page> may be helpful. (...) Only my hairdresser knows for sure! JOHN (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Two New MOCs
|
| (...) Is that photo from your own gallery? I may have to inform (URL) Norway> about you. (...) "Long term coals" almost qualifies for an FUT ot.pun. Amen. Dave! (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Two New MOCs
|
| (...) That may be true, but the kid turns 16 in a few weeks, and it's all I can do to prevent him from slipping into his (URL) "dark ages">:-( Actually, neither one of us has done much since Cincy. But we have some long term coals in the fire, so (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
|
