 | | Re: Here's a scary one
|
| (...) This is a tough conversation to have because, to some people, even suggesting that child molesters might not actually be the devil incarnate is tantamount to molesting children yourself. I've been in online forums with a decidedly left-leaning (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Here's a scary one
|
| In the UK, we do not name-and-shame as it is recognised that it can force individuals underground instead of bringing them back into society. Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Here's a scary one
|
| (...) I'm down with publishing convictions but accusations? Not so much. As it turns out maybe I'm biased, we had a recent situation where having the convictions published was a good thing as it got someone outed that really didn't need to be around (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Here's a scary one
|
| In this article: (URL) is proposed that the government keep and publish a list of all accusations of child molestation. While the intent to make it easier to discover molesters is good, it has serious consequences for someone wrongly accused. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts?
|
| (...) Update - I don't know why this piqued my interest, but it did. Anyway, Googling for PIC16F876 and CD4066BCM brought up a couple of interesting pages. Some of the images came from (URL) this page> on DansData web site. There's also a (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts?
|
| (...) It looks pretty darn real (although I'm not an EE so I can't tell). It smells legit as a page... although there are a couple of mysterious things. One, it's on a German domain (.de) and second, there are no other pages on the site. In fact, (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Thoughts?
|
| What do we make of (URL) this?> Is this for real? I notice "LOL" in the address line, of course... Dave! Should this be FUT'ed to ot.geek? (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Mmmm...mmm, read links
|
| (...) Heh, I still get a kick out of how that image uses incorrect grammar :) Twice! DaveE (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Mmmm...mmm, read links
|
| (...) (URL) Hey cool I read 'em too! :smack: Oooops, wrong forum ;-) Legoswami (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Megabloks acquires Rose Art
|
| (...) (snip) Interesting. IIRC Rose Art did some puzzles for LEGO, which presumably will not be contracts that are renewed. (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
|
