| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) Socrates was, for example, a Son of God, though I understand that that's not quite what you meant. (Socrates was more moral than Jesus, however). Off the top of my head the other big one I can think of is Appollonius of Tyre, whose name I may (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: pics of every new 2003 set righ here
|
|
(...) If you are trying to say that Ken is trying to say that the basketball minifigs aren't a good product, please tell him to say so. I, for one, have once had an accident which caused me to end up using crutches and really* do not appreciate your (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | test test
|
|
I did not see my last test post (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
|
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) I'm not sure it was the divine manifestation to which the 'uniqueness' was referring, but (as I took it) Christianity itself. IE that it is Christianity that is unique, with a unique message. Not the Jesus-being-the-son-of-God bit. I could be (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
|
(...) I would like to see your cites. Christianity offers a few unique twists. One which I believe is unique is the "fully human, fully divine" status of Jesus, and his fulfillment of OT biblical prophesy. I also am not aware of any God-incarnate (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|