| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) you know whats sad and my worst fear, is later in the year when these products arent making LEGO any money, the bricks are going to be sold for more to pay for the losses. i criticized LEGO before, and figured it was wrong, who am i to (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) I tell you what would be my worst fear, (apart from the entire company coming to pieces...no pun intended) - that these darned Galidork sets (you should trade mark that one, Tim!), along with Jack Stone, Software and all the other (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) When you're tired of the Jack Stone stuff, you pull it apart and build something else from it.... you probably combine some of your system stuff, because there aren't that many pieces in the smaller JS sets. The JS sets contain some good (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) first of all, i didnt write what you quote me saying, i believe that was cris, but i agree with him. (...) you cant, it sucks. which is why i dont buy that crap. (...) our point exactly! (...) and there you have it, "SOME". (...) yes it is, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) No, I think you'll find I quoted Cris, and said so, but I neglected to deleted the part of Cris's posting with your name on it (possibly in the same way that you accidentally deleted the bit at the beginning of my post which said "In (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
i can see where your coming from, its just that they seem to be competing with their own product, you know the figures of jackstone. and dont worry about that misquote thing, i havent been doing this forum thing for very long and i can see i read it (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|