Subject:
|
Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:27:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMstopspam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
2031 times
|
| |
|
|
Robb King <rk@KILLTHISrobbking.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > I know that the Lego trademark page says to never say "Legos." That
> > doesn't mean that the plural of "Lego" is "Lego," it means that they
> > don't want you to use the term generically. Get it straight. • [snip]
> Good point, but I think TLG said the same thing 24 years ago.
> http://www.robbking.com/GAH/LEGOplease.jpg <<-- notice bottom of ad.
Yes, that's the "Lego trademark page" referred to.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lore on Lego vs. Legos
|
| (...) Yeah, but within that trademark blurb, the LEGO Group asks you to refer to their product as LEGO bricks or toys, in the plural. People can read that a couple of ways: from the "brand name protection" angle, or from the "settle this plural (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
