 | | Re: LEGO wobbles as Star Wars and Harry Potter sales tumble —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | In lugnet.mediawatch, Allan Bedford wrote: (URL) A couple things in the first article really worried me: (...) This is disturbing, but I had two thoughts about this: first, most of the time when a company issues a statement, it's a public company (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO wobbles as Star Wars and Harry Potter sales tumble —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) So what is behind the ages on the Designer sets? The high number is 99. Does this mean that certain LEGO product lines are good for life, but others have a limited appeal? :) (...) Yes. Allan B. (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO wobbles as Star Wars and Harry Potter sales tumble —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Either that or it's a sop to us. :-) ++Lar (thought about "flaming" Allan about the whole concept/product thing but realised I totally agree with him... kids (the major market, so they keep telling us) buy products, not concepts. Only (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO wobbles as Star Wars and Harry Potter sales tumble —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) I had to look up the word 'sop' but no I don't think that's what it is. I'm pretty sure it's just the work of some marketing guy. :) (...) Well... I am pretty sure I'm glad you didn't flame me. :) (1) And to clarify (whilst agreeing with you) (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | |
