 | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) This would be a good example: (URL) - No "(r)" Guild of Bricksmiths - No "(TM)" LUGNET - No "(TM)" Refering to the Guild of Bricksmiths(TM) as simply "the Guild" Surly another case of: "do as I say, not as I do"! ;) Scott A (...) FUT : (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss... —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Was this a constructive post Scott? I remember you once asserting that your posts outside of l.o-t.d were always constructive. Chris (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | constructive posts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I doubt I said "always"? I would also suggest you read the context to my comment, where KW was able to show a little humility in his response: (URL) we agree that hypocrites chastising people for writing “Lego” rather than “LEGO(r)” would (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: constructive posts —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Written in .debate: "when I post outside this group I try to be 100% constructive. I have to be..." You didn't use the word always, you used 100%. And, to be fair, you said you try. So are you asserting that this was constructive or that you (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: constructive posts —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I would assert that I made that clear in my last post to you? (...) I would agree that it would not be constructive if I were to bait Larry. Read the thread again and think about who is doing the baiting. (...) These "remember to dot your eyes (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
