 | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | If there is no benefit to sellers, who is going to participate? You can set up whatever scheme you want but unless there is motivation, you're going to have a lot of buyers but no sellers. I know I certainly would not sell for less than the most the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) This is true, which is why I think a statutory 5-10% profit should be standard on such a system. That way sellers won't lose money, but they also won't feel guilty or profiteering by making a small amount. The way the proposed system works is (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Who says 5-10% profit is even WORTH doing anything? So I'm supposed to buy $500 worth of closeout Lego after Christmas, spend literally weeks sorting it with my wife, then auction off the bulk of the parts I don't need for a lousy 5%? I'd have (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) It would be your choice, and no-one would pass judgement upon you either way. I don't think that both systems are mutually exclusive, and I think each has its uses. (...) The names that I know probably make profit, but I don't believe that (...) (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fair Auction? (Was Re: Honest Capitalism) —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | In article <YZzdNx2DUuvsNBNRZYL...@4ax.com>, Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> writes (...) The New Lego Order - This millennium Lugnet, next millennium the world! A thousand years of fair-play! (25 years ago, 14-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
