Subject:
|
Re: MIB listings when they are not MIB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 May 2001 12:35:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
396 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, David Lewis writes:
> In lugnet.market.auction, Kevin Salm writes:
> > MIB listings for items when they are not drive me crazy !!!
> > ...
> > Please do not over-use the term MINT in describing auctions. It drives me
> > crazy!!!
>
>
> I'm glad I'm not the only one this really bothers. It seems to have gotten
> worse over the last year and a half or so.
I think you can safely assume that it bothers a lot of people.
> I went so far as to e-mail ebay and ask if they had guidelines for sellers
> as to what "mint" means. They basically said no and I should read the text
> to determine what the seller means by "mint".
Ah yes, the ever helpful eBay support staff comes through again....
> I typically only buy mint lego (real mint, not played with once), so I've
> just decided to never buy anything (mint or not) from a seller if I see them
> describing used items as mint. I'm probably only hurting myself, but I
> think it's unethical, and I refuse to do business with people that behave
> that way.
Would that more people would do that.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MIB listings when they are not MIB
|
| (...) I'm glad I'm not the only one this really bothers. It seems to have gotten worse over the last year and a half or so. I went so far as to e-mail ebay and ask if they had guidelines for sellers as to what "mint" means. They basically said no (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-01, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
