 | | Ebay question
|
| I was browsing around Ebay and found this interesting auction: (URL) the text and compare it to the picture... Something is terribly wrong. As a beginner browsing Ebay, are there things i need to know before using it(As a buyer) not to be fooled? (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Ebay question
|
| (...) Hmm... Am I missing something? I don't really see any problem with the auction, other than the fact that I think there are some pieces there that weren't made till the early/mid 80's... looks like it's fine though... Was there something in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Ebay question
|
| (...) auction, (...) made (...) something (...) trying to (...) Maybe it's just me.... The pieces are really nice. But I do not think that "THERE ARE 247 OLD MISCELLANIOUS PIECES HERE" is a correct description. IMHO, I think that the text should be (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Ebay question
|
| (...) Yeah, the ad is definitely misleading. It claims the LEGO is from the "late 1960s and 1970s". Looking at the pile, most of the pieces seem to be from the late 1980s at the earliest, while some are 1990s. There might be a few pieces that old, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Ebay question
|
| Thank you Kyle! This was valuable, and highly appreciated information. /Joakim "Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:G1trE5.14n@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Ebay question
|
| (...) I don't mind the buisinesses. Several of them are actually quite good (Michael Tanner, eBay ID mikebbc@earthlink.net is one example, he and his brother run a comic book store, but he finds a lot of used LEGO, his descriptions are good, and he (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
