 | | Re: Regarding Bricklink Utilities
|
| (...) Optimal cost is, I'm sure, a very difficult problem (probably NP-complete). But even ignoring shipping costs would be a good place to start. Minimizing the number of stores reduces shipping cost. It may not the absolutely lowest cost, but it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shopping, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) When the AFOL community asks for something and the response is that we represent only 5% of their market so don't expect anything, that does send the message that we are not important to them. (If they want to give me "only 5%" of the money (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) I don't think it does either. At least not completely, because the market isn't a shifting one (at least not at the like LEGO/don't like LEGO level) I'm just drawing the analogy to the very first people in that model that take something up (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:I17q8K.EHH@lugnet.com... [ .... snipped ... ] (...) early (...) just (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I am not sure I think the Chasm model applies to this market but I may be (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| (...) It would help if I realised Chris was talking about BrickShelf instead of BrickLink. I still think the point stands though... not all users are current users and not all users are serious AFOLs, it's (somewhat more?/about as/nearly as?) likely (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
|
