 | | Re: "Self Insurance" on packages
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Frank Filz writes: <major snippage> (...) Check this out... (URL) (and I can't get the url to post without something breaking the line) scroll down and read that part titled 'Insurance'. Looks like the USPS wants/is- about (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
| | Re: "Self Insurance" on packages
|
|
(...) I think it's a reasonable idea. As Ray mentions, that's a cheaper rate than the USPS charges. Of course, my feeling is that a buisiness would score points for eating the cost out of their proffits. As a buyer, I've sort of felt that I really (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
| | Re: "Self Insurance" on packages
|
|
(...) In lugnet.market.theory, Kevin Wilson writes: (...) (1) The USPS gets 0.85 for the same coverage (2) If your loss rate is 2/1500, then expect one package in 750 to get lost (although I think that might be a bit high, one in 400 ?) (3) If you (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
| | "Self Insurance" on packages
|
|
I noticed on anotehr seller's eBay auctions that they charge a 50c "Self insurance" fee on each package, and promise to refund up to $50 if the package is lost. This seems like an interesting idea since most of my packages go out at the "Small (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.shipping)
|
| |
| | Re: Envelopes are NOT enough (was Re:...never receive your package?
|
|
To All, Well, I use bubble mailers with ziplock snack size bags for most of my shipments, I switched over to Priority mail for obvious reasons with the small boxes now (VBery good of ther postal service to have this, IMO), but I have had no (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.shipping)
|
