|
|
 | | Re: BrickBay Enhancement (was Re: PayPal only in USA?!?)
|
| In lugnet.market.services, Steve Chapple writes: <brickBank!> I like the idea. Let's say 100 people submit 1 order from each of 100 shops = 10,000 orders (or 10,000 payments being sent back and forth). Each buyer sending 100 checks, each seller (...) (26 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.services)
| | | | | Re: BrickBank ! (was Re: BrickBay Enhancement )
|
| (...) Indeed. That is *the* sticky point. I have dodged it by keeping things pretty informal, it's just a circle of friends, really. Be careful what questions you ask of whom, though, unless you are prepared to accept the answers you get. And that's (...) (26 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.services)
| | | | | Re: BrickBay Enhancement (was Re: PayPal only in USA?!?)
|
| In lugnet.market.services, Steve Chapple writes: <brickBank!> I gotta run, I will respond in depth later, but yes, in principle this idea has a great deal of merit. It is encompassed by the Lugnet Manifesto so it's theoretically coming to here. But (...) (26 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.services)
| | | | | Re: BrickBank ! (was Re: BrickBay Enhancement )
|
| Paul, (...) Dan, (...) government (...) malls or (...) account for (...) Hmm... well, maybe I misinterperted it then. It sounded a little risky from what I read. Well, good luck setting it up. It seems a little redundant to me. Scott S. -- Soon to (...) (26 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.services)
| | | | | Re: BrickBank ! (was Re: BrickBay Enhancement )
|
| Actually, since there are no liabilities assumed or assurances given by Dan, and no licenses from any government sought, there is no need for government involvement. Essentially, we become a private consortium --- much like some antique malls or (...) (26 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.services)
|
|
