 | | Re: Junk Box #1 Thread —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Someone could turn the box inside out, the USPS got their return for supplying the box for free by now, I am sure. Or someone could even use a new box! While it's neat to see how many reps you can get out of one box it's not a requirement I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Junk Box #1 Thread —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <37E53899.8CEDCE97@v...er.net>... (...) I have used USPS priority mail boxes "inside-out" from time to time. The USPS frowns on this big time. Yesterday the guy at the counter closely looked at one of my boxes and (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Junk Box #1 Thread —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Really? I've never had a problem with using inside-out PM boxes. And I typically ship packages with the same clerk I get the boxes from. By preference, I'll use something other than inverted Priority boxes, but if nothing else is on hand, and (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Junk Box #1 Thread —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I don't think the USPS would mind that. Heck, I used an inside-out PM mail box the other day when I sent something to the UK Global Priority. At the time I didn't know I could have ordered GP boxes... One of the places I order DVDs from (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Junk Box #1 Thread —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | My sense is this... if you get a free priority mail box new from the PS, you should use it for Priority mail. That's why the PS buys them for you, for you to use for Priority mail. Turning a new one inside out is, to a certain extent, defrauding the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
