 | | Re: New group...moving forward? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) I also wrote (on 10 July in lugnet.general): (...) Any thoughts? Todd, did you have any assumptions about this as the idea's originator? (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New group...moving forward? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Anarchy, I suppose, unless/until someone wants to orchestrate things in a more coherent manner. Certainly the newsgroup could be used for coming up with rules and regulations, etc., as well as regular talk about what sorts of things people (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New group...moving forward? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I ought to clarify that a bit -- I'm not offering to write anything to handle this _yet_. I think later it will all fit in nicely with the rest of the infrastructure. (I just can't make it a priority anytime relatively soon.) Having multiple (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New group...moving forward? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I should clarify that bit too -- by "let go" I mean not staying closely involved with the evolving rules and day-to-day interactions. Since it's got so much potential to evolve into many different types of packages and rule-sets, I'd rather (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
