 | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) How did that happen? I thought the original idea was not to decrease the overall general value -- increasing it is optional and considered a bonus, no? --Todd (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | This is a general question: when the next recipient of a box doesn't respond to emails, should one move on to the next person on the list? In this case I'm trying to contact Daniel Delcollo about Technic Box #2 (Chris Weeks has it right now, before (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | (...) to (...) Eric, When you get the box ready to send, go ahead and send it to Paul. Just make sure he knows its coming. If Daniel surfaces, we can always send it to him later. Thanks to all for the updates. This box has taught us (at least me) a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Technic Box #2 Update -shipped (was: Update) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I think there has been a general feeling that one should try and increase the value. One consideration of course is that since value is an inexact science, you probably can't make an even trade, therefore, one should generally err on the side (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| | | | |
